Actually most of us who voted for him twice got what we expected...you guys just don't like it.

Posted at December 5, 2007 1:31 PM in response to NeoCons Go Ballistic on Iran NIE

Dude, you're fighting a losing battle with these guys. Just changed the title to "Bush lied people died" and they'll love it. It actually sounds like an interesting read.

Posted at October 24, 2007 10:29 AM in response to CURVEBALL: Spies, Lies and the Con Man who Caused a War

Let's see if I can clear it up for you. 70% of House Dems voted against reauthorizing the Patriot act. 85% of House Dems voted to grant Constitutional rights to terrorist detainees. 95% of House Dems voted against the Terrorist Surveillence legislation. Any questions?

Posted at November 1, 2006 3:25 PM in response to Where's the Outrage?

When Democrats speak their mind and from the heart, this old dog will still hunt. Because, as GWB is now fond of saying in every speech, "I'm not saying they're unpatriotic, I'm saying they're wrong!" (followed by unbelievably intense cheering).

Posted at November 1, 2006 3:28 PM in response to Where's the Outrage?

Seen the ad, read your assessment, where's the "racial code" you are talking about?

Posted at October 25, 2006 4:00 AM in response to Mehlman's Tennessee Ad: Looks a Lot Like Corker's Ads

Did you even read the document you linked to?

This is what was supposed to happen:  Spent Fuel: The spent fuel from North Korea's 5-megawatt reactor at Yongbyon is to be put into containers as soon as possible (a process called "canning") and removed from the country when nuclear components for the first light-water reactor begin to arrive after North Korea has come into full compliance with IAEA safeguards.

This is what did happen: The canning process, conducted with U.S. financing, began April 27, 1996 and was finished in April 2000. The spent fuel, however, remains in North Korea, and Pyongyang may have reprocessed it into weapons-grade plutonium. The amount of fuel is sufficient for several nuclear weapons, according to the CIA.

If my calculations are correct...April of 2000 came before the seven seals were broken and the Angel of death assumed power in Jan of 2001. So K-Dog (as Sec. Albright refers to him) wasn't following the agreement BEFORE GWB "called him out of name".

Posted at October 13, 2006 3:08 AM in response to At 0135 GMT A Seismic Event Consistent with an Atomic Test Was Registered

I know you guys love pumping up your boy, but the closest Clinton ever came to "pepareing for war" was on the Fox News Sunday set a couple of weeks ago. All Kim Jong Il did while he was negotiating with Amb. Albright was suck up as many concessions he could and then immediately break all of the agreements he made.

Posted at October 9, 2006 11:17 AM in response to At 0135 GMT A Seismic Event Consistent with an Atomic Test Was Registered

Because he disagrees with you. After all that's the reason you give them to me...

Posted at October 2, 2006 3:11 AM in response to Are You a Republican?

...and losing elections that you should win by a landslide...

Posted at October 2, 2006 3:14 AM in response to Are You a Republican?

If you expose the identity of an undercover CIA officer in charge of tracking down Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, you might be a Republican.

 Ok, help me out here, I thought you said there were no Iraqi WMD. 

Posted at October 2, 2006 3:17 AM in response to Are You a Republican?